Being well adjusted to a psycho-emotionally disturbed environment is not evidence of mental health.

Disinformation Methodology

Fuck you Gavin Newsom you pedophile favoring wannabe Dictator piece of shit!

My name is Munson. It is the only name on my birth certificate. I was born in Seattle. My modified birth certificate says Rik Wayne Munson. It had to be modified or the Orange County School District would not let my mother enroll me in the 8th grade. This is an example of duress. We will see duress a lot in our journey and I will attempt to point it out at each turn. Let’s start with the “Birth Certificate”. What is its purpose? All chattel must be inventoried but the more important focal point is the nature of the inventory’s relationship to money. This is where that discussion turns to notes and bonds and instruments of a commercial nature.

Look at the U.S. Dollar. The U.S. Dollar represents a note, evidence of debt. What is its surety? “The full faith and credit of the United States”. The dollar bill tells you this on its face, regardless of its face value. We will return to the discussion of “money” and other mediums of exchange in due course. Note everything is as it is made to appear. 

If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.

Fictions of Law

Let me make one thing perfectly clear from the onset. I am not a person unless I act in the capacity of one. A “person” is a fiction of law (a legal fiction).  “Person” comes from the Greek “persona” referring to the mask the actor wears. Corporations are persons (legal fictions). I am a man, one of we the people. You will not find man or woman referred to in statutes. That would be because statute is an abbreviation for statute staple or statute merchant. In other words, “statute” refers to commerce. This all leads straight to a foundational question.

What is Law?

In layperson terms, law is an attempt to define the boundaries of social order. It too has multiple personas. We have public law and private law subsumed within a taxonomy of distinctions within distinctions. Public law is a rigid set of rules applicable to everyone (in theory) and private law is based on the law of contract. We also have a controlling aristocracy that is not the product of law but derisive of law at its core inception.

What is Government?

What are kingdoms but gangs of criminals on a large scale? What are criminal gangs but petty kingdoms? A gang is a group of men under the command of a leader, bound by a compact of association, in which the plunder is divided according to an agreed convention. If this villainy wins so many recruits from the ranks of the demoralized that it acquires territory, establishes a base, captures cities and subdues people, it openly arrogates itself the title of kingdom.

— Saint Augustine (what 380 b.c.?)

Government is an abstraction of the mind that only exists in contemplation of law. This is an important distinction to make out front. Public officers are not “government” but “people” who occupy positions of public trust charged with the preservation of public justice. They are more properly described generally as “government actors” and more specifically by the office they occupy.


“A person who sues or is sued in his official capacity is, in contemplation of the law, regarded as a person distinct from the same person in his individual capacity and is a stranger to his rights or liabilities as an individual. It is equally true that a person in his individual capacity is a stranger to his rights and liabilities as a fiduciary or in a representative capacity.” Elizondo v. Nat. Res.’s Conservation Comm’n, 974 S.W.2d 928, 931 (Tex. App.—Austin 1998, no pet.), quoting Alexander v. Todman, 361 F.2d 744, 746 (3d Cir.1966).




The CDC's state-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

What are behavioral risk factors? Exercising your right to voice your opinion? Political choices and opinions based on facts? Using science instead of the advertised noise bite? Unwillingness to be herded like chattel? Refuse to get the poison jab or wear masks? Showing the middle finger to dictatorial mandates? Repudiating the mass psychology of fascism? Telling that slithering piece of treasonous shit in Georgia and his seditious color-of-law criminal cartel to go fuck themselves? Demanding honest elections and lawfully elected government actors? Peaceably assembling to protest fraudulent elections knowing government insurgents will create the violence necessary to for Government Actor Thugs to prosecute the American People for exercising their right to petition for redress? Are these Behavioral Risk Factors?


Anybody notice how quickly they had the photos of the alleged hijackers on all the major Shame Stream media channels only minutes after the 9/11 terrorist attack? Anybody notice the gleam in the eyes of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell and Joe Biden in the White House after their successful assault on America? A “terror Attack” designed to provide an excuse for an unbridled power grab and the Homeland security and Patriot Acts? Anybody notice how all of this crap we are being subjected to mirrors the Nazis?

I will not use Facebook or LinkedIn because they will delete any posts they don’t agree with. HOW IS THAT A SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM WHEN THE DIALOG IT IS UNDER THE COMPLETE CONTROL OF A FASCIST CARTEL?

Anybody notice how all the major Shame Stream media channels had the same bullshit story of death and destruction from Covid-19 at the same time? Fear! Fear! Fear! Fear! The only other variant I worry about is Stupidity. Stupidity affects most of society because most of society were good little school children that needed to be told what to think. Unfortunately, I was unable to avoid noticing the obvious contradictions between ideological rhetoric and applied science. The probate mafia is a group of individuals, bound by a compact of association whether explicit or implied, engaged in the 3rd party interception of family generational asset transfers. These people stuff their pockets with filthy lucre and in the process cause multiples of their gains in damages to their victims. In other words, their victims suffer more injury that anything these predators hope to gain individually and collectively. If you have an estate planner and your trust is designed to distribute the trust assets into separate trusts for your loved one’s at your passing you just opened the door to 3rd party predators in perpetuity. Your beneficiaries will be pitted against one another or pitted against a 3rd party predator made trustee by the estate plan design or by the court. If you do not distribute the assets outright and not in sub-trusts there will be nothing but problems.

Routine Traffic Stop for Infraction in California is color-of-law false arrest! Don’t take my word for it. Read the Law!

Former FBI head confirms FBI infiltrated by Illuminati Cult

Covid Is Genocide - A Biological Warfare Crime - Dr. David Martin Speaks to The European Parliament

Mobeen Syad MD MS 9th Cir shocked by vaccine mandates

Pedophilia is how the Deep State recruits and controls

What is Money? Ayn Rand

 X Corp v Bonta This is Elon Musk suing the California Attorney General: Case documents downloaded 9/11/2023 and there are more to follow whether I keep up with it or not. In my review of the matter, I find California Assembly Bill 587 an illicit attempt to censure social media until there is only one narrative, the voice of “Big Brother”. There is a reason why the First Amendment was the 1st of the first Ten Amendments. These are the declarations of rights that were not included in the Constitution because of the doctrine of Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. 

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius

A Latin term literally meaning "the expression of one thing is the exclusion of the other". This is a common law principle for construing legislation which holds that a syntactical presumption may be made that an express reference to one matter excludes other matters. Other common syntactical presumptions are ejusdem generis and generalia specialibus non derogant. The fear was that expressing certain rights would create a plausible excuse for arguing that other rights not expressed do not exist. The Bill of Rights itself declares that the declaration of certain rights was not to be interpreted as disparaging others not specifically expressed. In other words; Expressio unius est exclusio alterius does not to apply to the expression of rights contained therein.


People, we need to wake up to the deep state and the 13 satanic families that run the world with impunity. STAND UP - If you are not willing to die on your feet you will surely live on your knees. Just say no to dictator mandates. Just say no to masks and just say no to the mRNA jab, falsely represented as a vaccine.